»Posted by
Tony | July 18, 2009
| Comments (0)
The fraud President, Barack Obama, who lied this country into believing he was a liberal in order to get elected, nominated a wishy-washy judge that has no clear liberal leaning to the Supreme Court.
And only now are the liberals realizing that Obama is not one of them. He is a corporatist in disguise, a moderate deal maker more concerned with his image than with progress.
And so, with a chance to put a Justice on the Supreme Court that could clearly articulate a liberal vision for the future of American jurisprudence, he has appointed someone who, like him, is a corporatist masquerading as a liberal.
Only when this fraudster Sotomayor was questioned by the Senate did the liberals realize we weren’t getting one of us: we were getting just another pro-corporate pro-government moderate more concerned about protecting the status quo and her career than with justice.
The hearings were a moment of history that liberals had awaited for 15 years: an opportunity for a Democratic president’s Supreme Court nominee to inject into the public dialogue fresh ideas about the Constitution and the law, beginning to recalibrate a court that has gravitated to the right.
A moment lost forever. Because it isn’t likely that this 60-seat majority in the Senate and the Presidency will be in control of Democrats at the next Supreme Court hearings. When Democrats had an opportunity to appoint someone to go toe-to-toe with Scumbag Scalia and the like, they appointed someone who will be known as the first Latina justice and nothing more.
Sotomayor’s inscrutability last week has raised fundamental questions: about the Obama administration’s approach to future nominations, the direction of the court, the way Senate Democrats are using the benefits of their majority and the influence of the American left.
I started screaming about this as soon as I started seeing the assholes Obama put in his cabinet–center-right hacks who thing change means nothing more than putting on a clean pair of underwear.
These are not “leaders” concerned with advancing the interests of the common, hard-working, American. These are hacks who were part of the status-quo that ripped our economy apart, and they are part of the group of folks who are desperately trying to keep things the way they are: bad for the average american, good for the rich.
Did the hearings reveal a true absence of liberal ideas in the 55-year-old judge President Obama chose to fill his first Supreme Court vacancy?
Duh. She will never take a liberal position that isn’t firmly within the mainstream. She will avoid every contentios issue to look “moderate,” meanwhile, the right-wing nuts on the court will continue to fight hard for their conservative agenda.
Either way, Sotomayor’s reticence, if not her nomination, has disappointed legal thinkers on the left. The hearings “did serious damage to the cause of progressive thought in constitutional law,” said Geoffrey R. Stone, a University of Chicago Law School professor who was dean there when Obama joined its faculty. Doug Kendall, president of the Constitutional Accountability Center, a liberal think tank, called them “a totally missed opportunity. . . . The progressive legal project hit rock bottom [last] week.”
That’s exactly right: Sotomayor signals the death of liberalism in the Courts. Conservatives can rest assured that liberalism was dealt a serious blow in the realm of the courts, and all at the hand of President “change” Obama, no less!
Even ultra-right legal groups like the Federalist Society are patting theselves on the back at this point!
Leonard A. Leo, executive vice president of the conservative Federalist Society, said conservative thinking essentially defined the hearings.
Democrats made “no effort to interrogate the nominee to make sure she would expansively interpret the Constitution,” he said. “She said she would apply the same basic principle of judicial restraint” articulated by the court’s most recent members, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. — both reliable conservatives.
These right-wing idiots think that the hackers they have on the court don’t make shit up. But they do, they inject their politics into every decision. Case in point: Marijuana. The conservatives are suppose to “narrowly” (they never do) read the constitution. Of course, when it came to states’ rights and Marijuana, they turned into a bunch of activists, reading stuff into the constitution that was never there.
They did it because they are huge ideologs and activists–that’s why they were put on the Court.
The president, Eisgruber said, may have decided not to spend political capital on the court while pursuing other difficult goals, including changes to the U.S. health-care system.
Yes, worthless changes that wont include a public option and will do NOTHING to solve the health care problems we have. Mark my words, Obama the liar will bend over and spread them for the health care industry.
He’s just waiting for his chance to, like he does with every other issue.
But he gives such a good speech! He talks a lot and does nothing–he is an empty suit with a big mouth.